ABDUL WAHEED versus ZUBAIDA
Limit Act 1908 Section 12 (5) [As the Delegation (Amendment) Act (XIII) of the Extra-Appeal Delay of Impact of Appeal, the agency copying the delayed effect, dated 1 10 1992 to provide certified copies of the judgment and decree But the delivery copies were set within the time limit set for the appeal on 2020 1992. In order to obtain a certified copy of the judgment and decree, the period is nine days before the appeal is heard in the Appellate Court. The petition was not granted under the Limitation Act, 1908. Applicants were delayed in filing the appeal that the deadline for filing the appeal was expired. The delay of every day has to be explained, the person's unwillingness to forgive the delay was hardly a good ground; the majority of the country's legal claimants faced this weak rule of delay, such as this. Vulnerability cannot be based on the need for legal oversight and there is no negligence or contention in it. The Lens Petitioner was negligent in filing a delayed appeal, even for nine days in the absence of an acceptable explanation. The reason for the delay cannot be condoned because the time restriction on the decision to delay the appeal is illegal. Zero can not be declared.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Head Marala lawyer