AKHTAR ALI SHAH versus SINGER SEWING MACHINE COMPANY
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (ii) In the payment of rent, Landlord argued that the tenant did not pay him the controversial rent or took the tender and alleged that the rent receipts related to the controversial rent were forged. A testimony of the witness and the landlord's lawyer. It was not clear at the time of the landlord's allegedly defaulted attorney that the disputed rental receipts were fake and his signature was not agreed upon, dismissing contradictory and sketchy evidence of the landlord's lawyer. Therefore, the tenant checked with the three witnesses to prove that the receipts were not fake, but were genuine and the tenant had not made any defect in the payment of the rent. Was also not disclosed unless an internationally renowned company such as a tenant has the ability to fake these receipts. I've no particular reason. The relationship between the tenant and the landlord was a burden to prove forgery, which accuses him of leasing the tenant's failure to prove the lease's receipt, even with the landlord barely proven without any evidence. Could not be, it was rightly found that there was no default by the tenant in paying the disputed rent to the landlord.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Kharian lawyer