Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NASIM versus MOHIUDDIN

Section 2 (f) and (j) claims the landlord and the tenant interlocutor to be the tenant of the landlord, but such claim of the interlocutor was rejected by the landlord, nor was there any agreement to obtain the rent. It may be proved that the landlord had earlier addressed the legal notice to the interceptor that the interlocutor had encroached on the dispute premises. In response to the notice, the defendant had clearly stated that he had nothing to do with the dispute which was legally withheld. The tenant's notice issued to the interlocutor by the landlord and his response by the interlocutor were properly proved when the court interfered with the defendant's refusal to be a tenant or to dispute it in a disputed premises dispute. Being a tenant of the house was ground. No right was created in favor of it, protected under law lawer from fb area from Patika lawyer