Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

Civil Procedure Code Order VII of CPC Plants O VII, R 11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 56 exempting tenants of property on declaration and order restriction under suit, property owner and shopkeeper There was a challenge in between. It alleges that the seller not only misjudged himself, but also violated the terms and conditions of the sale agreement. The tenants claimed that the sale agreement between the parties was terminated as a result of such misconduct and breach of the terms of the contract, and the tenant was fully entitled to buy the property from its owner. As the landlord's tenant, the owner and seller had no right to challenge or challenge the executed sale agreement, especially when the defendants had nowhere to claim that they owned the property. Have acquired the right Respecting the property and the defendants were denying the plaintiff's tenancy rights which have not been infringed by any of the defendants, they have no reason to bring a declaration and injunction against the property owner and seller. The plaintiffs' case was based on allegations and assumptions and the plaintiff did not show any reason for action. The plaintiff was dismissed. best advocate from Chashma lawyer