Find a Lawyer

YOUSUF versus ASSAD-UL-HAQ

Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 and 19 of the Civil Court Rules, RR 105, 106, 107 and 108 of the previous Part Order were passed separately against the tenant that the tenant neither appeared nor was present. Despite that, he filed a written statement. The serving tenant claimed that he had never taken notice of the matter nor had any knowledge of the case against him. On the bail notice that the tenant refused to take notice, alternative services were applied against the tenant, but notice was taken at the outer entrance of the premises. Was not affixed in the presence of any witness: Rs 105, 106, 107 and 108 must be complied with without which the tenant could not be trusted against whom the previous part order was approved and thus did not actually present. It was stated that the pre-approved order against the tenant was set aside in the circumstances criminal advocate from Haveli Lakha lawyer