Find a Lawyer

KALU KHAN versus PURDIL KHAN

The West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 Section 42Autz Act (X of 1873), Section 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), allowed the applicant to make a statement at that time Was never asked for? Confirmed the variation in the question; and that the petitioner had sought to prove the sale of the claimant land in favor of the respondents by two variations, one of which was approved in 12 2 1972 and the other on 23 1 1973. Given such variations because they witnessed the sale of the same land. Even though these two variables were fraudulent, none of them had entered the jumble until about ten years later, and none of the two variations were disclosed in the stabilization process, which was acknowledged. Was that it contained land. Was it ridiculously low to charge for such a valuable land? And the fact is that the applicant had offered, that if the dispute arising out of him failed, he would have to offer a resolution of a long dispute with the true Islamic spirit by special oath. Will be ready and ready. best advocate from Doltala lawyer