LATIF TRADING COMPANY versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
The provisions of Sections 157, 168 and 180 of the confiscation / confiscation provisions of Sections 157, 168 and 180, the Customs Act, 1969, which were mandatory in nature, must be strictly adhered to in the seizure of any kind of goods. Is responsible for Customers will also be responsible for confiscation under the Customs Act, however, whenever any goods were confiscated and no show cause notice was given in relation to this, Section 80iz of, within two months of consignment of goods under the Customs Act. Such goods shall be returned Section whose from, under the Customs Act, the person for whose possession the notice is confiscated must have the ground on which it is proposed to confiscate or impose fines. But in its terms the writing must also provide the opportunity for written representation. 5 180, a notice of cause under the Customs Act, 1969, was presented in connection with the seizure of the applicant or the launching of questions, confiscation / such confiscation, had no legal effect, directed the authorities. It was supposed to issue a port clearance certification to applicants if they would be able to load and sail from the port as they wish.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
