UMRI versus MUHAMMAD BOOTA
The Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 44 Parties governed by customs when the customs plaintiff (son of the deceased last male holder) under customs sued for the possession of a limited estate holder for the care of the land. It was customary to challenge such a gift. Should the limitation be governed by Art 144, the Limitation Act, 1908, it would be such a case that on the termination of the widow's limited estate the plaintiff automatically succeeds the deceased's last heir to the estate. The right to claim possession of the heir (plaintiff) until the defendant has proved on the record that the title of possession by negative possession is the defendant's claim to the title by alteration of the gift. , They cannot claim title through real property.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Kotli Loharan lawyer