MOHAMED RAFI ALI versus ZUBEDA KHATOON
Sindh Renting Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (vii) By providing sufficient and proportionate evidence on record, the landlord had personally proved to the great need that her husband was presently living near a building staircase. In a very small room, a goldsmith was running a business. The business was quite inadequate and inadequate because there was no place for customers to find a place. Landlady had proven that her husband was having trouble running a goldsmith business and The first impression that her husband wanted to make of his business was that the goldsmith's business could not be properly occupied by the husband of the landlord, where it could not provide suitable space for the clients, nor was it a matter of the tenant. At the same time, it was emphasized at the hearing that the business was being conducted by the real estate husband. Or is it enough for his business? The defense taken by the tenant was that the landlord was interested in Anna. In the case of houses in dispute, the personal need of the landlord depends on the personal need of the landlord. Which was denied the truth, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Fateh Jang lawyer