KHAN MUHAMMAD ALIAS KHANAY versus LUQMAN
Volume 9 of the Act, 1873, dismisses the decision of the Oath Impact Petitioner when prosecuting the Oath Valuation Petitioner after section 9, when his application was presented on non-trivial terms by himself if the witness (nominated in the petition) ) If the Holy One makes a statement about us, whatever he said in court, then his claim should be testified to the Holy One. Has given 1/3 of its property to the defendants' lawsuit and appeal. The courts had full effect on the evidence that is deemed final in the meaning of Section 9, the Oaths Act, 1873, so it cannot be allowed to withdraw from its presentation [y technical understanding order / There was no interference with the illegal, irregular or illegal warranty granted on the basis of the decree.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Gharo lawyer
