BISMILLAH COTTON FACTORY versus WAPDA
The Electricity Act 1910 Section 454 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), OXXXIX, RR l, 2 and Section 115 temporarily prohibit the collection of arrears of arrears under the order and disconnect the power supply to the applicant's factory. The trial court directed the applicant to submit the disputed amount of the electricity bill by a certain date and in the case of such deposit, the defendant was instructed not to cease the supply of electricity. The appeal was upheld by the trial court. In the payment of the liabilities of the applicant for the success of the review, it was essentially determined that in dealing with the matters, some material irregularities were made by the following courts, or jurisdiction by the aforesaid. Incorrect exercise has been performed. No interference was guaranteed by the High Court in the exercise of the jurisdiction of verification in the courts. The applicant was instructed to pay the disputed bill within one month, failing which the respondent applied. It would be free to take action against them.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from FR Peshawar lawyer