MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus ALLAH DITTA
The joint effect of the Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 115 Paris 25 and 26 paragraphs 25 and 26, specifically seeking the F-Suite for pre-authorization based on the right of tenancy vests, is exclusively to the collector in whose jurisdiction the vacant land. It is decided by the Revenue Revenue Authorities. In any such proceeding, which the Revenue Authority is entitled to decide under MLR 115, the challenge cannot be brought before the civil court in a civil suit. Civil courts have no jurisdiction to verify a pre-photo order passed by a collector. In the exercise of the jurisdiction of the appeal, the Additional Commissioner (Revenue) confirmed the appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Wah Cantt lawyer
