Find a Lawyer

AMANULLAH KHAN versus WAPDA

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 1212 A civil servant who was on a deputation with Wapda received three months' leave to move abroad with his family and promised that he would not get a job anywhere. Ga and the civil servant did not return after the termination. He was discharged and instead worked overseas where he was still employed and requested extension of his cave in view of various policy areas which were rejected and fired after a charge sheet. Was, based on the policy guidelines sought by the civil servant. The person already on deputation did not apply for leave extension. He himself could not go to any other deputation. Besides, he promised not to work anywhere else, so he did not resign unilaterally. Could give ; If he had not made this promise, he would not have been discharged to ex-Pakistan; what was more than that, working abroad, permanently abandoning his job in Wapda and dismissing his date in the dismissal order. Referring to the date mentioned and quitting his job, it was said to be nothing but fact and it was not a question of passing a despair order or a question of Wapda's power but not returning after the holiday was over. And the conduct of public servants by taking unauthorized employment abroad when you need a advocate from Noor kot lawyer