AHMAD KHAN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Government Land Colonies (Punjab) Act 1912 Section 10 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Property, which was purchased by the applicant through auction and the entire purchase money was deposited, which in the case of questionable land. Conduct is right to execute; In the preliminary litigation period, dismissing the applicant's constitutional request, the Land High Court directs the collector to give his right and direction to the Collector, Collector / Deputy Commissioner to decide the case of illegal delay. Was instructed to stand trial in his court. , Following the remand order by the Additional Commissioner, but despite this direction, the collector slept on the matter and had not decided the matter for nearly 14 years, the matter was already dealt with as auctioning with the applicant. Has concluded with the order of the Board of Revenue. The full amount of the buyer and the auctioned land auction, according to the rival claimant's claim, had already been entered into by a partner M-Promise and after that the decree was approved, a certain amount of money was deposited in the terms of the agreement and the auction. The money was withdrawn by the legal claimant of the dispute over the competing claimant for the purchase, so the land collector is no longer pending proceedings. The question was, who was the auction buyer, so, the Member Board of Revenue had no profitable order, so they would behave as such because the applicant's name would have to be canceled or resumed under the question. Was avoiding Within a month with further guidance on the applicant's movement of the land acquired in favor of the applicant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Khushal Kot lawyer