Find a Lawyer

BADSHAH JAN versus SHAHZADA SIRAJUDDIN

Settlement of the Dispute of Real Estate Chitral Order 1980 This document, maintained by the Chitral administration, shows that the land held by the appellant's ancestors and the descendants of Chitral on March 26, 1310 AH through the appellant and his order. Was declared exempt from service order and the payment of permanent culling was not disputed by the parties' High Court and the Tribunal, however, it did not disregard the documents which confirmed that the land appellants. Owned and exempted from the Act prohibited by Khidmat and Qulang. In asking Shajal-ul-Mulk appellants to render Khidmat against the orders of his ancestors - it was against the common law of Islam and no other legal law could overturn that decision if there was a gap in the legislation. That was impossible. In Islamic law, through any legal rule, the courts in Pakistan have to fill such an unlawful field without the custody of the ruler in front of the CTS and their unlawful and illegal activities. Will not work on the rulers' ancestors as their land will be treated with appellants. For more than a century, unlawful forced interference by the heirs of the rulers and failure to provide the device to the ruling ancestors could not be removed from this land. criminal advocate from Risalpur lawyer