Find a Lawyer

ABDUL AZIZ versus YAHYA

In a lawsuit filed by the original owner of the home on a default basis for the payment of rent, the Sindh Tenant Prince Ordinance 1979 section 16 (1) (2), while preventing the defendant from overturning the rent, will pay for rent and future monthly rent. A temporary rental order has been approved to submit the dues. It may be said that the original owner of the sale sold the property to the landlord who had applied for a replacement of his owner's name as the applicant in place of the original owner, which the rent controller requested. But the appeal was allowed by the tenant who was submitting the rent to the court. Temporarily in compliance with the rental order, the rent has not been collected since the date when the petitioner applied for a replacement of the landlord's names was removed by the controller, no doubt The tenant's landlord's request was dismissed by the rent controller, but the order was dismissed and the appeal process was resurrected and rescheduled and negotiated with the revival of proceedings, mutual orders / temporary. The T-Order also became operative default when in history, when the transfer was in place The exemption was dismissed when the dismissal order was rejected, it may not accept the death penalty contemplated under section 16 (2) but after the restoration of this order, the tenant was obliged to submit. The rent of this period and its failure to do so shall be liable to remove its defense from the law which merges the mutual orders in the final order, under which the merit or defa law firms from Kotmomin lawyer