Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD

With the R22 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the appeal of the Section 152 re-hearing and any other decision on the alternative to the decision, the decision of the Tribunal was to decide on the employees that the Tribunal stated in our order that we Advised parties to present their disturbing ideas through learning, but lawyers for the parties were not present, the employee argued that the tribunal's observation was incorrect, the decision had to be rewritten because the tribunal's incorrect views , There was a clerical error, accidental slip and error that could be corrected under R22. With section 152, the tribunal corrected the CPC error as pointed out by the employee, but the tribunal refused to rehearse the parties and prevent their decision from being an alternative decision, such as employee 22. Gave powers to the courts under section 152; , CPC: The Tribunal does not have the power to substitute its decision by any other decision unal and immigration advocate from Jehangira lawyer