AMIR ZAMAN versus ABDUL KHALIQ
Sections 7 and 9 of the Oaths Act, 1873, decide the case on the statement of a nominee by a party that the leased parties shall have the liberty to adopt in their case at any stage. During the post-remand proceedings, the person designated to settle the dispute in a unanimous manner, even though the statements of the parties and the court's order have been described as witnesses, is still the status of a referee. On the basis of the statement of the referee, the decision cannot be allowed to rely on any part of the statement in favor of which the defendant agreed upon the decision of the dispute as to the nominee's statement. Can not be allowed to step down from , That is, to approve and reproduce, the decision by the lower appellate court in the case of referee Dave's statement, after the nominee has made a statement against his interest. s valid, lawful and cannot be objected to: [Approval and Denial]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Khanpur lawyer