SHER BAHADAR ARBAB versus MUHAMMAD USMAN RAJPUT
R9 (1) General Principles of Seniority, paragraph 13 (ii) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Appellants and respondents qualify the CSS Examination Public Service Commission with equal opportunity, however, Appellant. Assign seniority to and include defendants. The Applicants group, which found that appellants and respondents have equal numbers in the CSS seniority, had received fewer numbers than the final passing out defendant after joining the Civil Service Academy Authority. Respondents should have been assigned older than. Under R9 sub-rule (1), the Pakistan Finance Services (Probation, Training and Seniority) Rules, 1972 and Parab (ii) of the General Principals of Seniority, correctly determine the seniority of the defendants and such appellant. What was The commitment was unimaginable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Kazi Ahmed lawyer