Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSUF versus THE STATE

Sections 14 and 6 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 and Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), Section 555, in their report, Section HA did not disclose the proceedings with which the applicant was imposed, and the petition. The general reputation of the applicants or any other allegation against him, such as under section 14 of the Act HO's Act Report, was also against the spirit of section 14 of the Act which required repeated offenses while the applicant was the only one Was involved in the pending case, citing only against police witnesses. The applicant, whose evidence alone can not safely be ruled out, is pending before the magistrate before adjournment. best advocate from Rahimyar Khan lawyer