MALIK QASIM ALI versus THE STATE
In the Complaints Devices Act 1881 Section 7 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 561A and 439, no offense against the accused Sessions Court has been disclosed, therefore, to properly allow the appeal. There was an error in getting the remand for this trial later. If the trial proceedings in the trial court against the accused were allowed to continue in the circumstances, this too would have been an abuse of court process and consequently changed the application under section 6161A, CRPC. Went and the action was undone. Accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Amangarh lawyer
