NIAZ ALI versus MUHAMMAD DIN
Section 42 law testimony of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 (10 of 1984), Article 118 would not raise the concept of fact in the officially approved modification of entries that were not yet included in the record of rights. As a summary of the change proceedings in nature, their purpose was to keep a record of the receipt of land revenue, however, they were acceptable evidence and depended on the circumstances of each case to be weighted, as in the variable entries. As such, the person who relies on such entries has to prove admission in accordance with the rules of evidence that apply to proving admission. Initial proof of proportional transaction in the mutation must be useful to the mutant. Is on individuals
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Mamu kunjan lawyer