Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NIAZ ALI versus MUHAMMAD DIN


Section 42 law testimony of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 (10 of 1984), Article 118 would not raise the concept of fact in the officially approved modification of entries that were not yet included in the record of rights. As a summary of the change proceedings in nature, their purpose was to keep a record of the receipt of land revenue, however, they were acceptable evidence and depended on the circumstances of each case to be weighted, as in the variable entries. As such, the person who relies on such entries has to prove admission in accordance with the rules of evidence that apply to proving admission. Initial proof of proportional transaction in the mutation must be useful to the mutant. Is on individuals

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from Mamu kunjan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.