ARSHAD KAMAL KHAN versus SAEEDA KHALID KAMAL KHAN
The Tenant Premises Ordinance 1979, 16 of the rent controller's failure to temporarily comply with the rent order, justified the grant of rent control powers because the landlord between the parties. And the tenant relationship didn't exist. No, therefore, do not temporarily approve the rent order, which resulted in non-compliance with the tenant's defense ban, the note of rent between the parties was already in the file, which is not in dispute for implementation. And was also compatible with property in dispute. In this way the tenant was not required to temporarily comply with the rent order which could be adjusted and replaced by a final order on the determination of the matter to be avoided by the tenant and against this order in question. The breach was banned, and because of legal punishment it is not possible to avoid it unless good reasons are given and the relationship of the landlord is maintained. And the tenant between the parties for the purposes of the eviction request and the deposit of the rent, however, pending the civil court, if any, will not affect the suit of title.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Sialkot lawyer