RASUL BIBI versus SIKANDAR HAYAT
The Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 (c), Second Word Petty, whether in record of rights or not itself, will not constitute a subdivision of the village is not sufficient to determine the formation of a sub-division for collection of land revenue. In view of Section 15 (c), the actual role of the Pre-Strip or Sub-Division \ Roads / Sub-divisions, the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, must be associated with good characteristic, ie the uniformity of the area or the village. Owner descent. The plaintiff was neither reliant on the Divine nor the Settlement Record, nor has he made any reference in his evidence to the history of the village that the tribal relations belong to the owners of the tiie area or uniformity of the area. Is just relying on. The entries in the Revenue Record that could hardly be accepted as excluding the position of evidence placed on the plaintiff, thus, failed to prove that he was the owner of the "strip" in question. D situ was chic
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer
