Find a Lawyer

MUNAWAR KHAN versus NIAZ MUHAMMAD

Article 212 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 allowed an appeal to examine questions of public importance law, namely, that legislative assemblies or members serve in the jurisdiction and jurisdiction for appointments at public offices and positions. However, they cannot interfere with the rights of public servants. However, they must adhere to the procedures laid down for the appointment of public servants. Whether, in the context of this matter, public representatives may be construed as violating the law of the land, the Service Tribunal was justified in expressing the opinion that the "representative of a governmental obligation" act / waiver through In this case, there was a need to perform other functions besides them. However, their conduct in this matter is an example of unnecessary interference in the affairs of government officials. If the observations and findings of the service tribunal regarding the dismissal of a civil servant are maintained, the service tribunal may be entitled to it. Was. By this same decision, the order of appointment granted in his favor was restored on the due date as it was tainted by similar weaknesses which was seen in the neglected decision. patent advocate from Abbottabad lawyer