Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

DISTRIBUTION OFFICER, HOECHST PHARMACEUTICALS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Status of Employees The High Court did not question the status of the employees in that position as it was a question about which to find out. Has been recorded by. The Labor Appellate Tribunal, which was not open to questioning the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction, should have questioned whether the employee was an employee or not, after giving the case evidence to decide the question about the employees' status. The High Court was remanded to examine the case, after giving both the parties an opportunity to submit additional documents if necessary for the decision. In the jurisdiction of the Section 25A Foundation of Labor Court, the person who requested pro-section 25A views should be a laborer.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kamalia lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.