MUHAMMAD SHAHID versus KHALID MEHMOOD TABASSUM
Sections 78 and 156 (1) (8) and (9) of the Customs Act 1969 seized the gold with the applicant while he was traveling to India, the legal applicant was acquitted by a special court. Therefore, the gold recovered from it was not legally confiscated under Section 78, Customs Act, 19 6969, that the Special Judge determined that the applicant acted in transit and had no intention of obtaining gold. To smuggle Pakistan into Pakistan, because it was bound to the customs authorities after the deadline was reached because they were parties to such a decision and did not choose to challenge the Central Board of Revenue, which led to a decisive result. Were there any announcements made by the applicant, the seized arms smuggling attempt could only be made when he applied to the applicant. He was acquitted on the charges of smuggling, neither in law nor equity to be deprived of the gold which he restored or the value of
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Sahiwal lawyer
