Find a Lawyer

FAHMIDA BEGUM versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN

Sindh Retired Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 14 and 15 persons entitled to evict tenants under section 14, widows, orphans, salaried employees, retirees, retired persons or persons who reach the age of 60 years. Were due years of age or already, however, in the rental premises under section 14, vacant occupancy may be granted only if the rental premises were necessary for their personal use. If it was not, then it was not necessary to confirm. Such an effect would have been sufficient to capture the rental premises through a summary procedure, but in each case the landlord had to say in clear and unambiguous terms that the landlord needed the land for his personal use. Landy stated in his cross-examination that he was prepared to give the ground part of the damaged premises a better rent, if the tenant agreed to vacate the first floor of the underground residence, he had an indicator like this. By the admission of, the fact that the lower floor complex didn't need it and didn't require that the house Uzzie was overpaid, so, she failed to bring her case under section 14 (1), when Landlady was widowed in 1986. , Tried to evict her because she was a widow in 1989, but the facts of the landlord's delayed action also cast doubt on the fact that the tenant's premises were in need of a residential complex. Occupation was already granted (it was not entitled to occupy the ground floor). Commercial part) of the premises famous supreme court advocate from Nilam lawyer