Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MAJEEDAN versus MUHAMMAD NASIM


The Code of Conduct 1908 Section 115, referring to the evidence of witnesses examined by the parties before the court, also cites the costs of some of the persons who were not cross-examined by the appellants. This was not confirmed by law, however, nothing could be disclosed in an unjustified judgment to show that the appellate court's finding was based entirely on such evidence and the parties. The statements made in the previous proceedings between the KSA did not affect his mind. No doubt, such a decision would be bound to be set aside, as it has been stated that the statements recorded in the various proceedings cannot be read as evidence in this case, in respect of the appeals in this regard. There was no dispute regarding the realistic ion dispute raised by the source. The appellate court's decision to set aside was set aside and a remand was sought to settle the case accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Daur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.