MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus THE MEMBER (JUDICIAL), CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, KARACHI
Sections 139, 156 and 168 of Pakistan Customs Act 1969 (1973), jurisdiction of Article 199 constitution, petitioner's practice claim that the shipment containing fragments of spectacle frames, which were confiscated by the customs authority, Hong. Booked for Bangkok as a parcel goods in Kang. It was not offloaded on Bangkok but was mistakenly offloaded in Karachi. The applicant claimed that after considering the evidence on the applicant's records and conduct, he was entitled to release the seized goods, eventually finding that the purpose of the inquiry was in Karachi. Applicant's transit goods is a considered thing: The offense under section 156 (1) (9) of the Act, 1969 has been filed against the applicants, based on the evidence of the record, the facts of the authority below The simultaneous search of the constitutional jurisdiction cannot be interfered with. By the High Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
