KBALID MAHMOOD versus CHAIRMAN, ZILA COUNCIL, GUJRANWALA, DISTRICT GUJRANWALA
R4 Constitution of Pakistan (19/73), Art: 199 arbitrary jurisdiction, tender use of questions, after being given to the respondents, work on this project is already underway and half of it has been completed, some useful. The purpose will not be fulfilled. In such a case, the High Court refused to revoke its arbitrary jurisdiction, especially when the defendant's contract was terminated, especially when suffered for public benefit. The applicant was waiting a long time before filing a constitutional petition through which the question in question was already in place. Work on Defendants and Project Has Been Started Petitioner Can: Refer to Defendant before Contracting
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Sangla Hill lawyer
