Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and Schedule Declaration of Muslim Marriages Act (VIII 1939), Section 2 (ix) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 with constitutional jurisdiction Khla`s argument for termination of marriage It was challenged not to dissolve the marriage because the wife did not return the jewelry and at the time of the marriage it was given to her by the jewelry does not prove that the wife was in the husband's wife's jewelry, therefore, Neither was she obliged to return it or her evidence instead proved that the jewelry and dowry were still intact by her husband and the trial was a good decision. l The reasoning was based on and was consistent with the law in which no legal impediment was identified with this legal judgment and decree. Interference with constitutional jurisdiction was not guaranteed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
