NASAR ULLAH KHAN HUNJRA versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR AND NARCOTICS CONTROL(INTERIOR DIVISION)
Sections 8, 9 and 10 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 were admissible in evidence for the purpose of the content inquiry proceedings before the Inquiry Officer, which substantially limits the person who initially received the crime to the accused. Was connected to. The trial belongs to the court's domain and did not guarantee delivery during the magisterial inquiry proceeding, which is preceded by a sessions trial committal subject to rubric which has a trial case and In addition, proof of this cannot be presented. There was a misunderstanding of the judicial competence of a court that objected to a reasonable doubt as to the guilty verdict of the sentence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
