GENERAL MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, N.W. F.P. PESHAWAR versus INAYATULLAH
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 employees were charged with challenging a conviction that they were negligent and that the bus was speeding, hit by a truck and damaged, no accident The witness was not produced before the inquiry officer or before the court. The truck owner or driver who was allegedly damaged in the accident was not presented, who did not support the investigating officer's report on the spot, based on the inquiry officer's report which proved negligence. Neither evidence was supported or the driver's fault for speeding or the employee who wrote the report of the accident was not examined in court. The employee could not be found guilty of the accident because of past mistakes. In the documents, the court, in this case, was perfectly justified in completing the period of the case without evidence and administration. Mayha's request for a complaint against employees imposed a fine has been rightly accepted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Sanjwal lawyer
