Find a Lawyer

IRSHAD MUHAMMAD ALIAS DADAI versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 304, Part I and 300, Exception 4 The purpose of the sudden fight counter case was based on some minor dispute between the deceased and the accused, which occurred some time before the incident took place. Is. The accused was a witness to the incident as usual. Declaration of a death; general inquiry recovered. The motive behind the planned murder is not strong. Injury to the accused while participating in the incident. And the entry of the accused was available at the counter FIR of his participation. In the witness's account it was stated that the two sides fought each other over some minor matter dispute and this was not planned in advance and both were injured each other and the nature of the victim's injuries. It does not appear that they are the result of any extraordinary or cruel act by the accused. If the accused himself was not of the same gravity as the accused, then similar injuries were inflicted. Exceptionally, the fight and the punishment should have been punishable under section 4304, Part I, PPC Supreme Court, while section 2302 While acquitting the accused, the PPC changed its sentence under Section 4304, Part I, PPC. female advocates from Haveli Lakha lawyer