Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS, KARACHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Reinstatement without benefit, Appeal against appellant workers was fixed against permanent vacancies where they worked for more than 89 days but were neither regulated nor permanent employees. All benefits were given and their demand resulted in termination of their services. The court denied the benefits of returning workers' restraining orders even though it had liable for mills because the illegal mills administration failed to show that the appellant temporarily hired employees on a specific type of work. Which allowed workers to go back 30% for a specific period. Benefits in situations famous lower court advocate from Mangal Sada lawyer