Find a Lawyer

THATTA CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED, THATTA versus THATTA CEMENT EMPLOYEES\' UNION, THATTA

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 50 Employees \ Cost of Living (Relief) Act (1974), Section 3 [The Employing Cost of Living Amendments (Amended) Act (Relief) Act (XIV of 1985)] Settlement, Explanation of Cost Emplo Resident Allowance Adjustment Memorandum of Settlement concluded between employer and collective bargaining agent, which resulted in a significant increase in wages and other allowances and facilities to employees in the existence of a contract between the parties. The bargaining agent called for an increase in the wages of the employees. The Act was brought under Section 3 of 1974, which was demanded by employers. According to the interpretation of the agreement between the parties, the focus of the collective bargaining agent was that the Government had, under Section 3 of the Act, 1974 The increase was also made available to the employees. Under the agreement reached between the parties, while the employer's interpretation was the one which increases under the section, the contract had to be adjusted in 3 additions to Act 3. The parties have failed to resolve their disputes among themselves because their views were applied by completely different employers under Section 50 of the Act, 1969, under which the Charter of Consideration is considered. The collective bargaining agent's demands, settlement memorandum and the circumstances surrounding it, have concluded that the increase in cost has increased under Section 3 of the Act, 1974, in favor of the employer. The claimants were to increase the increase under settlements between the employers and the collective bargaining agent under Section 3 of the Government-Aided Increment Act, 1974 advocates from Qambar lawyer