Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD AKHTAR versus MUHAMMAD AYUB


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 38 (3A) and 53 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 249 Amplee filed a complaint against the trial court for violating a trial retention order prohibiting the employee from employment. Initial inquiries were made and proceedings were issued when the informant withdrew the petition and applied under section 249A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 the informant's request was dismissed on the ground that no evidence was recorded. Therefore, it cannot be said that the allegation against him was baseless. In view of the fact that the Court cannot be interfered with in Review 4, under Section 249A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, before the challenge was made, there was sufficient material in the form of evidence.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Pindi Bhattian lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.