ABDUL AZIZ CHAUDHARY, ADVOCATE versus S.D.O. ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT, SUB-DIVISION MIRPUR
OXXXIX, the additional power bill filed by the plaintiff was dismissed and the trial court upheld the trial court's decision. Defendants' statements regarding the plaintiff's statement were not scrutinized, while documents appearing in the additional evidence have proven that in the case of the plaintiff / appellant, the correct copy was kept on file by the Department of Electricity. ? The Department of Electricity, which noted that the committee formed to resolve disputes of electricity bills, investigated the appellant's case on additional bills and recommended a refund / adjustment of additional bills. The bill was issued by the appellant while he was not authorized to issue it under the law. Presenting the average or more bills was capable of detecting the present case, which would have interfered with the High Court's decision in the second appeal and The trial court and the appellate court orders were set aside in which the plaintiff's case was decided against the defendant. Was.
