Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 8 and 9 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution's exercise of jurisdiction were denied when alternative remedies were available, without the consent of the plaintiff, and under trial by law. The plaintiff's case is decided. And his order of rehabilitation at home was confirmed in the trial court's order. The Accreditation Order, passed under section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, is neither open nor open to review treatment in review, though neither interferes with it nor contains it. There is interference. , Was unusual and unusual, because alternative remedies were treated by civil suit under the title of section 8, the Special Relief Act, 1877, in the constitutional jurisdiction under the Special Relief Act, 1877 Due to the presence of, will not begin to investigate the decision of the disputed question. On the basis of its title, according to fact and law, it was still open to the aggrieved party, despite the negative decision under Section 9, to go to C. Under the Special Court for the Evil Court Section 8, Special Relief Act, 1877 And to receive appropriate relief under the provisions of Section 8, the Special Relief Act, 1877, was neither inconvenient nor inadequate, but the fact that interference with the constitution was the only appropriate action was denied jurisdiction and the defendants. The applicants were left to follow their usual treatment in accordance with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
