SAIN MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD YOUNIS
1908 Section 151 of the Code of Conduct The trial court refused to collect the suits, while the High Court ordered the collection of the two cases. Both cases were tried separately and the statements of witnesses were recorded in both suits. Went to trial even though the trial court recorded at one stage. That stability was necessary. Nevertheless, the suit was not consolidated and separate proceedings continued, separate proceedings are being conducted in both cases and the statements of many witnesses have been recorded separately, the conclusion of justice will not be done because of the stability Proofs have to be pre-recorded and this results. The further delay in the settlement of the suit, which had been absolute since 1978 and 1980, was its stability order, which was not justified, however, after the completion of both suits had to be disposed of simultaneously.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Lalshanra lawyer