Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SAIN MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD YOUNIS


1908 Section 151 of the Code of Conduct The trial court refused to collect the suits, while the High Court ordered the collection of the two cases. Both cases were tried separately and the statements of witnesses were recorded in both suits. Went to trial even though the trial court recorded at one stage. That stability was necessary. Nevertheless, the suit was not consolidated and separate proceedings continued, separate proceedings are being conducted in both cases and the statements of many witnesses have been recorded separately, the conclusion of justice will not be done because of the stability Proofs have to be pre-recorded and this results. The further delay in the settlement of the suit, which had been absolute since 1978 and 1980, was its stability order, which was not justified, however, after the completion of both suits had to be disposed of simultaneously.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.