Find a Lawyer

MURAD KHATOON versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN

The petitioner claimed that she was legally the wife of the deceased and was entitled to inherit the property. The second wife had the deceased's sons and daughters, denying that the petitioner is the wife of the deceased. The respondents further alleged that the deceased was a Shiite believer, so the applicant could prove himself as a widow even if he was innocent. Alternatively, if the deceased could not succeed in inheriting the trial court property, the plaintiff / applicant was the legally married wife of the deceased, which was proved by faith, following the trial court's inquiry into the property of the appellant. The right to inherit the legacy of the deceased, but the widow of the deceased entries in the electoral roll The applicant was shown to be a widow, presenting the findings of the trial court regarding the applicant's status. The respondents themselves had confessed that the applicant was living in the house of two witnesses and the victim of the Petitti himself, who had made the statement that he was married to the deceased. In the investigation of these witnesses nothing was revealed as to why they were lying and nothing was brought on the record by the respondents as the applicant should make false claims. That she was the wife of the deceased, no woman of old age in society would falsely claim that she had been the wife of a body. There was a strong possibility that the applicant and the deceased who were living together were wife and husband, the possibility of a mutual relationship could not be ruled out which was a strong evidence of marriage between the two, which resulted in ard separation, when up to how to become a advocate from Doaaba lawyer