Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ CHUGHTAI versus IRSHAD BEGUM

The controller found that the landlord and tenant relationship between the landlord and the tenant affected the refusal of the tenant to effect the rent of section 2 (c) (i) of Ordinance 1959 of the West Pakistan Civil Rental and The tenant's refusal was wrong and after deciding on the relationship, the landlord and the tenant between the parties determined the payment of rent by default and without any further inquiry into the personal need of the landlord. Despite the directive to evict the landlord, the tenant requested in his written statement that the landlord Has been paid rent where the tenancy is denied. As requested by the tenant, it has been proved wrong that it cannot be presented as a globally applicable principle that the inquiry order must necessarily be taken without further action Is that even after the decision of the preliminary case, further inquiry into the existence of the landlord's relationship and on the basis of which the tenant, the tenant was dismissed, was tried to rely on the facts of each case, if the rent. The lender, in his written statement, not only disputed the title of the landlord in dispute, but did it without paying the landlord's rent It also denied the right to receive, and conducted further investigations. There will be an exercise in wasteful expenditure, but where the tenant requested payment of rent, it was necessary for the tenant to decide whether the tenant paid the disputed period and if so Without a rent controller property advocate from Tarmatan lawyer