On the basis of Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and the marriage schedule on the basis of khola, the husband did not seriously contest the court's finding that this was a valid case in which the marriage was to be dissolved on the basis of khola. ? If the marriage parties were allowed to marry, it was likely to exceed the limit given by the husband. The husband merely claimed that the wife was obliged to return the gold jewelry in exchange for the khula, which instead of the husband failed to prove to her the husband by providing unidentified evidence that he had given the jewelry to the wife through the door. In the absence of evidence to prove the facts of the supply of jewelry to the wife through the Dover, the court below correctly ruled that the jewelry was not in fact handed over to the wife by the husband, even if it was a fact in the marriage contract. Mentioned
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
