Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD HASSAN versus MITHU


Paragraph 25 (3) (d) of the Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 115 (d) The tenant had the exclusive right to vacate Wendy's, despite having purchased a share of the joint lease, retaining the tenant's role in relation to the land in dispute. The High Right of Occupation Settlement prematurely litigates not only the tenant at the time of the sale of the land in dispute, but also the pre-literate superior recognized by paragraph 25 (3) (d) of MPR 115 To take advantage of this right even at the time of the decree and order even if he had purchased some land from the joint plots and had become a partner.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Quaidabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Explore

Platform

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Terms Privacy Policy Refund Policy Delivery Policy Made in Pakistan 🇵🇰