The displacement (distribution and rehabilitation) Act 1958 Section 20 questions on the distribution / distribution of premises, they were standing on the side of the road and have long been used freely and in the possession of applicants, approved by the Settlement Commissioner. The order made was based on the same argument after which the High Court set aside the decision in the first order period. The material was either kept on record or considered by the Settlement Commissioner to come to the conclusion that the covered premises were not discriminatory, although such premises were part of the main house that was allocated to the defendant, Nevertheless, the split or otherwise the composite building had to make a decision on the attendance of the building which was present and prove that the covered area was a separate part of the main house.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 1993
