MST. MUSARRAT versus THE STATE
Applauding the Pakistan Penal Code Section 453 evidence, the accused had forcibly seized the house and took the law into his own hands, which, with the help of the police in the execution of the writ of possession, the court guarantor seized the complainant. Therefore, the rent controller was charged with committing a criminal offense, nor did the civil litigation result in any way that could not be construed as unreasonably low distortion or distorted punishment. And the conviction of the accused is maintained under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer
