Sections 468, 467, 409, 471 and 109 of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 367 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Government Misunderstanding Act, 1948, Section 4 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Accountability Commission Act, 1997, Section 4 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Accountability Bureau Act 2001, Section 11 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Anti-Corruption Act, 1950, Section 2 (5) Fraud for fraud, fraudulent use of valuable security, fraudulent documents by government employee, use of fake documents and corruption Definition of evidence The benefit of the doubt is that the accountability judge approved the ordinary conviction of the accused under different law provisions, though separate charges for each offense. Services were imposed, the accused has been charged under the law when it was necessary for the Court and sentenced under them. Different provisions of the Code of Conduct; and other laws; then separate sentences under each section were to be passed by the trial court. And non-compliance would violate the provisions of section 676767, CCPC did not uphold the judgment, sentence and sentence, only the accountability court itself accepted any doubt, thereby no death sentence. There was no legal justification. And the accused was entitled to the benefit of the doubt The Judge of the Accountability Court misunderstood the legal principle of proof beyond any evidence of the evidence, the prosecutor failed to prove the charge against the accused, the defendant withdrew for evidence and the conviction. Done, under the circumstances
