MUHAMMAD SHAHEEN versus MISS SULTAN JEHAN
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 The landlord and the landlord and their witnesses respectively have the personal need of the landlord's affidavit, the file related to the residential landlord was examined while the tenant and his witness were four consecutive dates. Absent at the hearing During the investigation, his affidavit in the evidence was broken and the tenant's direction was stopped and his dismissal ordered, even if the tenant and his witness The affidavits are also taken into account, though it has been proved that the landlord is entitled to claim the premises, in this case There is no justification for seeking remand for Landlord's claim that he has no immovable property other than a landlord's landlord, a tenant cannot be contradicted because he is unable to produce any evidence to the contrary. Has failed. He had no other cover and was living with his brother / father / mother or living in a rented house once it was established that the landlord needed premises premises for his personal use. If so, the tenant could not propose it in any way, otherwise the landlord's prejudice but the tenant's will would not prevail. In such cases the landlord was ordered to evict the tenant as per the personal need of the house.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from FR Bannu lawyer