Find a Lawyer

CHAMAN CINEMA, KARACHI versus FATCH KITILLANIMAD

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Articles 25A & 38West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 1 (4) Complaint filed by the Labor Court Was excluded on the basis of The year before the action against the employees, the employer employed fewer than 20 people and thus the provisions of the Ordinance of Ordinance, 1968 did not apply to the parties, the Labor Court finding, unlawful by the employer. Record-based records such as receipts reflecting actual employment and compensation for the relevant period, as well as receipts reflecting payments to Social Security and employees that the Old Age Benefit Institution failed to provide any credible evidence about the employee Recruitment by the employer during the year prior to the wrongful action The donation was 20. The appellate tribunal ordered the labor court to just gr, according to the evidence that the register submitted by the employer was manipulated because the tribunal did not specify any reason for the order to arrive at that conclusion, The wrong order obtained by the tribunal could not be sustained while the order to dismiss the complaint of the employees approved by the trial was issued. The record on which the court was based was maintained power of attorney advocate Mian Chunnu lawyer